Search Results for "employment termination"

1674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Unfair Termination of Temporary Employee. Termination of a peon appointed on compassionate basis held invalid, but compensation of Rs.25,000 deemed adequate given short service and nature of appointment.

The petitioner, Sandip Pandurang Nannaware, was appointed as a peon on 01/01/2002 in place of his father at Shrigonda Krishi Utpana Bazar Samiti. His ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stigmatic Termination of Temporary Employee Without Enquiry — Violation of Natural Justice. Termination order set aside as it contained allegations of misconduct and was passed without any opportunity of hearing or departmental enquiry.

The petitioner, Vishwanath Dnyanoba Kirade, was appointed as a Clerk on 24.7.2006 by the first respondent, Nav Akanksha Mahila Mandal, which runs the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Teacher in Termination Case — Termination Held Simpliciter. Temporary teacher's services terminated; allegations in order did not make it stigmatic under Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The appellant, Tulsiram Kashinath Gaulkar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 1/7/1985 on a temporary basis as he was not a trained qualified te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Workman Challenging Termination as Contractual Appointment Not Covered Under Industrial Disputes Act. Workman Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Project Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, D.N. Shivaraj, was appointed as a Work Inspector on 06.08.1990 by the Belgaum Urban Development Authority (respondent No.1) and the Gov...