Search Results for "electric connection"

364 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 364 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal by Electricity Board in Bill Dispute Case — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Theft of Electricity. Trial Court's Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Proper Issues and Consider Evidence on Meter Tampering.

The case involves an appeal by the Executive Engineer, Gujarat Electricity Board (now Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd) and others against a judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Electrocution Death Due to Negligence of Electricity Board. Widow and Sons of Deceased Ashok Kakde Granted Rs. 10 Lakh with Interest for Death Caused by Unsafe Electric Supply from Pole on Agricultural Land.

The petitioners, widow and sons of deceased Ashok Kakde, filed a criminal writ petition seeking compensation of Rs. 10 lakh for his death due to elect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 136 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kenchanna, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Spl. C. No.285/2008 for an offence punishable under Section 136...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Conviction under Section 304II IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused knew the fencing was likely to cause death.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Ramesh Bagaitkar and Subhash Patil against their conviction under Section 304II of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...