Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Yahoo India Pvt. Ltd. for Lack of Creditor-Debtor Relationship. Petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as disputed debt arises from tripartite arrangement without privity between petitioner and respondent.

The petitioner, Inflow Technologies Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Yahoo India P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.

The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...