Search Results for "dereliction of duty"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation Against Illegal Quarrying Under Mines and Minerals Act. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, R.Sadhankumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Temple Land Encroachment Case — Non-consideration by Statutory Authority Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, V. Chinnaiya, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, N.G. Seenivasan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation Against Laying of State Highway in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, V. Asokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents ...