High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition No. 403 of 2022 and P.I.L. Writ Petition No. 32 of 2022. The Court adjudicated connected matters involving multiple respondents and state/government authorities.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "defence installation"
121 result(s) found
Found 121 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Arrears of Rent, Damage, and Unauthorized Construction Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Doctrine of Relation Back Not Applicable as Amendment Was Not Allowed to Relate Back to Original Filing Date.
13 Sep 2024The case involves a civil revision application filed by tenants (Anil Joginder Sachdev and Rajeev Joginder Sachdev) against a decree of eviction passe...
- 520
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Demolition of Cinema Structure Subject to Defence NOC in Property Dispute. Petitioner's right to redevelop is conditional upon obtaining No Objection Certificate from Defence authorities under Works of Defence Act, 1903 and Cantonment Act, 2006 due to proximity to defence installation.
11 Oct 2023The Petitioner, Sameer Baijanath Joshi, is the owner of land admeasuring 3,627.90 sq. metres bearing Plot No.9-A, CTS No. 37 and 38A at Village Juhu, ...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Order in Property Dispute — Appellants' Right to Use Property Not Barred by Limitation or Acquiescence. Court holds that temporary injunction cannot be granted based on mere possession without clear legal right and that delay in filing suit does not automatically disentitle relief if substantial rights are involved.
28 Jul 2023The case involves an appeal filed by the defendants/appellants against an order dated 01.03.2023 passed by the III Additional City Civil and Sessions ...
- 146
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Directing Shift of Toll Plaza for Violation of National Highways Fee Rules. Construction at 194 km of NH30 Found to Violate Rule 8 of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008 Due to Lack of Written Reasons and Failure to Meet Conditions for Municipal Area Placement.
23 Sep 2021The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by respondents 1 to 17 (writ petitioners) seeking to restrain the construction of a toll plaza at 194 km ...
- 282
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.
26 Apr 2019The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...
- 165
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Involving 'Kalpataru' Mark. The plaintiff, a well-known real estate developer, successfully restrained the defendants from using the mark 'Kalpataru' for their housing project, as it was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered and well-known trademark.
9 Jun 2015The plaintiff, Kalpataru Properties Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer established in 1975, has used the mark 'Kalpataru' as an integral part of its c...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Dispensation of Notice in Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Order Directing Municipal Corporation to Decide Application. Court holds that Municipal Corporation's failure to decide application despite court order amounts to contempt and warrants execution without notice under Order 21 Rule 22 CPC.
28 Mar 2014The applicants, M/s. Lok Holdings and Constructions Ltd. and others, filed a Chamber Summons in an execution application seeking dispensation of notic...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Prior adoption and registration of the mark 'KALPA-TARU' by the plaintiffs since 1977 and 2003, and the defendant's subsequent incorporation with a similar name in the same line of business, established a prima facie case for infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
29 Jul 2011The plaintiffs, Kalpataru Properties Private Limited and Property Solutions (India) Private Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction again...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award, Upholds Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that an arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the arbitration agreement regarding its jurisdiction is subject to the same limited scrutiny as any other contractual interpretation.
2 Feb 2005The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...
- 11
