Search Results for "court receiver"

874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Royalty for Court Receiver's Property in License Dispute. Court modifies Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month and enhances to Rs.1,50,000 per month based on valuation report and market rates.

The plaintiff filed a chamber summons seeking modification of the Court Receiver's order dated 24 August 2010 fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Customs for Wrongful Sale of Goods Held by Court Receiver. Plaintiff entitled to refund of purchase price paid to Court Receiver for goods that could not be delivered due to prior sale by Customs.

The suit was filed by M & H Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) against the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay (Defendant No.1) and the Commissioner of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Eviction Decree in Favour of Court Receiver — Tenancy Rights Not Extinguished by Consent Terms. The Court held that the Court Receiver could not evict the defendants as trespassers without due process, as the consent terms did not terminate their tenancy rights.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 22nd February 2010 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in S.C.Suit No.1154 of 2000, decreeing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Dismissal of Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Receiver's Sale Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC. Order 21 Rule 89 Held Not Applicable to Receiver Appointed Under Section 51 CPC as Sale Not Conducted Under Order 21.

In execution of a money decree, the judgment debtor defaulted on payment of agreed instalments. The executing court, invoking Section 51 of the Code o...