Search Results for "cessed properties"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "cessed properties"

21 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in MOFA Conveyance Dispute — Cooperative Housing Society Fails to Establish Entitlement to Deed of Conveyance Against Church Trust. Court holds that under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963, the obligation to execute a conveyance arises only if the promoter has developed the land and the society has paid the full consideration, which was not proved.

18 Jul 2016

The appellant, Our Lady of Vailankanni and Perpetual Succour Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit (SC Suit No.875 of 2011) in the City Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

23 Jun 2011

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project in Colaba, Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Defence Authority's Letter. NOC from Defence Authorities Not Required for Completion of Construction Under DCR 1991 as Height Restriction Under Works of Defence Act, 1903 Not Applicable to Building Height Below 30 Meters.

27 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment under the Development Control Regulations of 1991 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

28 Nov 2011

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Under Rule 133 for Delay in Seeking Adjournment to Judge — Security Order Already Set Aside by Higher Courts. Application Filed Beyond Four-Day Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause Under Rule 133 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980.

26 Nov 2010

The applicant, Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja, the original plaintiff in Suit No.3190 of 2006, filed an application under Rule 133 of the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies FSI Entitlement in Trust Property Development Dispute. Official Trustee Granted Declaration That Developer Is Entitled to Only 2294 Sq. Ft. FSI by Way of TDR Under Memorandum of Understanding and Court Order Dated 8.8.1997.

9 Mar 2005

The Official Trustee, Maharashtra State, filed a petition seeking clarification and directions regarding an order dated 8.8.1997 passed in Trust Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Official Trustee's Petition Seeking Restriction of FSI in Trust Property Development. Consent Order Did Not Limit FSI to 2294 Sq.Ft. as Claimed by Petitioner.

9 Mar 2005

The Official Trustee, Maharashtra State, filed a petition seeking directions and clarification of an order dated 8.8.1997 passed in Trust Petition No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement. Court holds that disputes regarding termination of a development agreement are arbitrable and that interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when the agreement itself provides for termination and the petitioner has an adequate remedy under the arbitration clause.

2 May 2017

The petitioner, B.E. Billimoria & Company Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an injunctio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

25 Nov 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)