Search Results for "certifying officer"

619 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 619 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures. Failure to Join Independent Witnesses and Lack of Proper Sampling Renders Conviction Unsustainable Under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) and 20(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, allowed two criminal appeals filed by Sharukh S/o Ayyub Khan and Shubham S/o Anupchand Chodhari against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Long Incarceration. The court held that the quantity of Codeine (200 grams) was less than commercial quantity (1000 grams), thus Section 37 NDPS Act not attracted, and granted bail considering the period of custody.

The applicant, Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 and Doubtful Chain of Custody. LSD Recovery Allegation Fails as Prosecution Could Not Establish That the Seized Substance Was the Same as That Tested by the Chemical Analyser.

The appellant, Roque @ Rocky Fernandes, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, North Goa, Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No.22/2015 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 52A and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband identity and sampling procedure.

The appellant, Mangilal, was convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award on Retirement Age in Industrial Disputes Act Cases. Employee of Amalgamated Company Seeks Retirement at 58 Years Despite Unit-Specific Standing Orders of 55 Years.

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, operated two independent industrial establishments: the Hosur Road unit and the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Disability Certificate Issued by Medical Board in BEST Employee Case. The Court held that the employer cannot challenge the disability certificate without independent evidence, and the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...