Search Results for "ceiling proceedings"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Reimbursement Claim Under NHIS 2021 for Aorto Bi-Iliac Bypass Surgery Despite Cashless Denial — Insurance Company and TPA Directed to Pay Rs.2,72,406/- with Interest. Court Held That Denial of Cashless Facility Does Not Extinguish Reimbursement Entitlement Under the Scheme.

The petitioner, P. Ravi, a Head Constable serving in the Tamil Nadu Police Department, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside SDO's Possession Order Under Section 120(c) of MTAL Act — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Revision Beyond Limitation and Allowing Amendment Without Notice.

The petitioner, a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, owned agricultural land survey 209 admeasuring 35 acres at mouza Umarkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Vesting of Land in State and Rejects Ownership Claim. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title and that the suit was barred by res judicata and limitation.

The case involves a dispute over land bearing No.73, Canal Circular Road, Calcutta, which was part of a larger parcel of land. The plaintiffs, claimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Ceiling Act Case — Purchasers from Surplus Land Owner Not Entitled to Review as No Error Apparent on Record. The court held that purchasers cannot claim better rights than their vendor and that review is not an appeal in disguise.

The judgment concerns two review applications (Miscellaneous Civil Application No.81/1999 and No.86/1999) filed by purchasers of agricultural land fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute Involving Surplus Land and Tenancy Rights. Court upholds Single Judge's order confirming that land was not surplus and appellants were not entitled to restoration of possession under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Bombay Tenancy Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals arising out of writ petitions decided by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The appella...