Search Results for "building bye-law"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order Against Elected Directors of Cooperative Society for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Suspension Order Issued Under Section 29C of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 Set Aside as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Afforded.

The petitioners, Smt. Kamalamma and Smt. Jayasheelamma, were elected directors of the Ballekere Mahila Milk Producers Co-operative Society Ltd. (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SCEA Directive Excluding Retired Employees from Voter List in Salary Earner's Co-operative Bank Elections. Directive Issued Without Authority Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and Bye-laws Permitting Retired Members to Vote Must Be Respected.

The petitioners, Nashik Zilla Sarkari and Parishad Karmachari Sahakari Bank Ltd. (a salary earner's co-operative bank) and some of its retired employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petitions for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservations under MRTP Act. Court Considers Whether Purchase Notices Served on Appropriate Authority Under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Were Valid.

The two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservations imposed on the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Restoration of Khatha and Acceptance of Property Tax. Deletion of Khatha Without Notice Violates Natural Justice Under Section 108-A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Mr. Jai M. Patil, is the owner of Flat No.S-3, measuring 2000 sq. ft., situated on the second floor of 'Pratham Enclave' apartment in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax — Failure to Pay Property Tax Constitutes Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sandip Ganpatrao Bhadade and Sau. Sangita Vijay Choudhary, who were elected as members of the Gram Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...