Search Results for "boundary wall demolition"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Removal of Unauthorised Construction on State Land in Public Interest Litigation. Municipal Corporation and MHADA Ordered to Act Against Encroachment Causing Nuisance to Neighbouring Society.

The Petitioners, the State Bank of India Employees (Sahishunta) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition seeking direction...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Demolition by Municipal Corporation in Land Dispute Over Survey No.123, Hissa 1A. Appellants' Right to Reconstruction Upheld After Wrongful Demolition During Subsistence of Interim Order.

The case involves two appeals filed by Chotelal Ramkaran Yadav and Jaggu Chauthi Yadav against the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Order Against Municipal Corporation for Breach of Undertaking in Unauthorized Construction Case. Court Holds That Breach of Undertaking Given to Court Attracts Penalty Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC.

The respondent, Bhikanlal Nanakchand Sharma, owned a shop near Mulund Checknaka, LBS Road, Mulund West, Mumbai. He and other shopkeepers had carried o...