Search Results for "betting and gambling"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Police to Conduct Fair Investigation in Crime No.193/2022 in Accordance with Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and RBI/NPCI Guidelines — Petitioner PhonePe Private Limited seeks mandamus for comprehensive probe.

The petitioner, PhonePe Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and a Third Party Application Provider (TPAP) in the UPI e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

GST on Advances for Future Supplies: Examining Constitutional Validity. Evaluating GST's application to unutilized advances and its constitutionality.

The L&T IHI Consortium, a collaboration between Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (L&T) and IHI Infrastructure Systems Co. Ltd., Japan, challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Recreation Club's Petition Declaring No License Required for Playing Skill Games. Rummy and other skill games are not gambling, and clubs do not need a license under the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement Order.

The petitioner, Sri Siragalli Lakshmidevi Recreation Club (R), a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, filed a writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner Club to Permit Mobile Phone Usage at Race Courses Without Additional Entertainment Duty. The Court held that mobile phone use is not entertainment under the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, and no additional duty is leviable.

The petitioner, The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., conducts horse races in Mumbai and Pune under a license from the State of Maharashtra under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...