Search Results for "attempted robbery"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery with Firearm in Chain Snatching Incident. Appellant's conviction under Sections 307 and 397 IPC sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Mohd. Hussain Kayyum Shaikh, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.340 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397, 307, 353 IPC set aside as sole reliance on police witnesses and delayed identification parade rendered prosecution case doubtful.

The case involves two appeals filed by original accused No.1 (Sayeed Rashid Shaikh @ Saidu Bangali) and accused No.2 (Amit Ismail Patel @ Ammu Batan) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Attempted Robbery and House Trespass — Evidence of Injured Complainant and Son Found Credible. Concurrent findings of fact under Sections 393 and 452 IPC upheld as not perverse.

The applicant, Chandu @ Chandrakant Ramkrishna Pawar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.5, Amravati in Regular Criminal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Section 394 IPC for Robbery During Marriage Party. Applicant Caught Red-Handed After Assaulting Victim and Taking Rs.300, Conviction Confirmed by Appellate Court.

The applicant, Matin Khan, was convicted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for robbery. The incident occurred during a marriage party w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to identify accused in court and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the crime.

The appellant, Shaukatali Abdulsalem Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 392 read with 34 and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC read with Section 120B IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act set aside as sole identification by witness was doubtful and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Maqbal Ahmed Gulam Mohd. Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai for offences under Section 392 read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in MSRTC Cash Robbery Case. Evidence of Injured Employees and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Robbery and Hurt Under Sections 394 and 332 IPC.

The applicant, Suresh Ananda Lohar, along with another accused Jagannath Shenekar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 394 (robbery) and 332 (v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Robbery Case — Conviction Under Section 397 IPC Set Aside as Firearm Not Actually Used. Robbery Under Section 392 IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Property.

The appellant, Ram Ratan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the MPDVPK Act, 1981, Sheopur, for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of the India...