Search Results for "attachment recall"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "attachment recall"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeals Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings. The Commission set aside the common order dated 11.09.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of execution applications under Sections 25 and 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Aug 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) heard appeals (AE No. 73/2024 and AE No. 74/2024) filed by the complainant/decree holder, ...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Possession — Directions Issued for Compliance Under Sections 25 and 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The decree holder is entitled to pursue both execution remedies simultaneously without being compelled to elect between them.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves execution appeals filed by the decree holder, Kishore Bhardwaj, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 of the State Consumer Disput...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings — Compliance of Decree for Possession or Refund with Interest. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the execution applications for fresh adjudication, keeping all contentions open.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves an appeal by Kishore Bhardwaj, the complainant/decree holder, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 passed by the State Consumer D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.

2 May 2025

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Warrant of Attachment in Execution Proceedings Due to Approved Resolution Plan Under IBC. The court held that the MSEFC award was subsumed by the NCLT-approved resolution plan, which provided for 15% payment of the claim, and the execution could not proceed for the full award amount.

18 Mar 2024

The case involves an execution application filed by Mars Art Studio (the judgment creditor) against Shirdi Industries Limited (the judgment debtor) to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insolvency Petition Against Deceased Insolvent, Holding Proceedings Abate Upon Death. Insolvency Petition Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 Abates as Act Does Not Permit Substitution of Legal Representatives.

5 Oct 2023

The case involves an insolvency petition filed by Prime Securities Ltd. against Anil Mithalal Shah under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Proceedings — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Application Under Section 31(1)(aa) is Maintainable Against Guarantors Without Separate Suit and Not Barred by Limitation.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Civil Imprisonment Order Against Guarantor in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Failure to Comply with Section 30 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Court holds that Recovery Officer cannot order arrest without issuing a show-cause notice and giving an opportunity of hearing as mandated by the Act.

11 Apr 2017

The petitioners, including Panther Fincap & Management Services Limited and three individuals, were aggrieved by an order dated 31 May 2007 passed by ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)