Search Results for "arbitrator eligibility"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for 2% Contract Value Without Work Execution. Claim for facilitation fee under MOU fails as appellant did not perform any work for the contract awarded to the joint venture.

The appellant, M/s. Pratibha Industries Limited, filed a commercial appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order Refusing Termination of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate. Appellant Failed to Demonstrate Bias or Justifiable Doubts Under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, a supplier of paper, entered into a contract with the respondent in 1993. Disputes arose regarding payment and quality of supply. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Pioneer Publicity Corporation and Airport Authority of India. Dispute arises from unilateral reduction of hoarding size from 8,000 sq ft to 5,000 sq ft and failure to refund security deposit.

The applicant, Pioneer Publicity Corporation Pvt Ltd, was the successful tenderer for a contract with the Airport Authority of India (AAI) for display...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Works Contract Enforced Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, a registered government contractor, was awarded a contract by the respondent, the General Manager of South Central Railway, for extensi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute — Depreciation Disallowance and Penalty Recoverable Under Contract. Arbitrator's interpretation of lease clauses upheld as plausible; no interference under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Chemicals (I) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...