Search Results for "arbitrator's award"

1575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Guarantee Enforcement Case. Personal Guarantors Held Liable Despite Principal Borrower's Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 14 of IBC.

The petitioners, Jamboo Kumar Jain and Praful Kumar Jain, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Remission of Arbitral Award for De Novo Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Error. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Claims Not Raised Before Chief Engineer and Commissioner Under Contractual Pre-Arbitration Procedure.

The appellant, Biwater Penstocks Ltd., a UK-based company, entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (first respondent)...