Search Results for "arbitral tribunal discretion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal discretion"

316 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Public Policy. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness and Non-Consideration of Vital Evidence Renders Award Patently Illegal.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the order of the Ci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Execution Matter — Post-Award Interest Calculation Must Follow Hyder Consulting Principle. Court holds that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is payable on the entire sum awarded including pre-award interest, overruling S.L. Arora.

13 Dec 2024

The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (appellant) to M/s. S.A. Builders Ltd. (respondent) in 1983 for con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Equipment Supply Dispute — Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Court Intervention. Existence of Arbitration Clause Confirmed; Court's Role Limited to Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Master Drilling India Private Limited, entered into an Equipment Supply Agreement dated 01.10.2021 with the respondent, Sarel Drill & ...

Supreme Court

Upholding Autonomy Amidst Settlement Disputes Exploring Legal Principles and Precedents in Arbitration Law

18 Jul 2024

This Judgment pertains to a legal discussion surrounding arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on the re...

Supreme Court

Arbitration Termination under Section 32(2)(c) - A Detailed Examination Understanding the Implications and Applicability.

16 May 2024

Appeal regarding the legality of terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It outlines th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)