Search Results for "appealable order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "appealable order"

479 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

14 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Appointment of Receiver in Share Pledge Dispute. Court upholds appointment of Court Receiver as receiver of pledged shares under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the appellant failed to make out a prima facie case for interference.

10 Aug 2019

The case involves two commercial appeals filed against an order of the learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as receiver of certain pledg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Holding Order Under Section 73A Not Appealable Under Section 70 of Mumbai Public Trust Act. Intervention Order Under Section 73A Is Interlocutory and Not a Final Order Under Section 22, Hence No Appeal Lies Under Section 70.

16 Aug 2018

The appellant, a registered reporting trustee of a public trust, filed a change report under Section 22 of the Mumbai Public Trust Act, 1950. The resp...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 9 Application. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arises Partly in Goa Where Agreements Were to Be Performed, Conferring Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

4 May 2016

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions (a partnership firm) and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9. Court Holds That Part of Cause of Action Arising in Goa Confers Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

4 May 2016

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Application to Dismiss Husband's Appeal as Time-Barred in Matrimonial Dispute — Limitation Period for Appeal Under Hindu Marriage Act is 90 Days, Not 30 Days Under Family Courts Act. Section 28(4) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, being a special provision, prevails over Section 19(3) of Family Courts Act, 1984, and the appeal filed within 90 days is maintainable.

17 Dec 2014

The case involves a civil application filed by the wife (applicant) seeking dismissal of the husband's appeal on the ground of limitation. The parties...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 376(b) and (c) CrPC in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Unconstitutionality Found. Petitioners convicted under Section 138 r/w 141 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 challenged the constitutional validity of provisions relating to appeal against acquittal, but court held them intra vires.

24 Jul 2013

The petitioners, directors and a company, were convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 26 July 2011 for offences under Section 138 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Substituting Dismissal with Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Employee's Misconduct of Carrying Unticketed Passenger and Improper Waybill Entries Did Not Warrant Dismissal; Industrial Court's Order Held Proportionate.

24 Jan 2006

The petitioner, an employee of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, was dismissed from service after a departmental enquiry found him gui...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)