Search Results for "amenity"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; Scheme for BTM Layout Allegedly Lapsed. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Due to Failure to Substantially Implement Scheme.

The writ petition was filed before the Karnataka High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by land owners whose property was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows PIL Challenging BDA's Deletion of Civic Amenity Land in Canara Bank Colony. BDA's Approval of Amended Layout Plan Reducing 16,000 Sq Ft Civic Amenity Site Quashed for Violating Statutory Requirements Under BDA Act and Zonal Regulations.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by the Canara Bank Colony Residents' Welfare Association under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking TDR for Parking Lot Construction Under Development Control Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for constructing a separate parking lot building on municipal land as per DCR 33(9) read with DCR 34.

The petitioner, Krishna Gopal Palande, filed a writ petition seeking a direction against the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to grant Transferabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds BDA's Power to Allot Civic Amenity Site on Lease and Demand Lease Rentals Under Regulation 7.1(2) of Revised Master Plan 2015. Regulation 7.1(2) is not ultra vires the BDA Act or the Allotment Rules, 1989.

The petitioners, Annabel Builders Developers Private Limited and Westend Heights Condominium Apartment Owners Welfare Association, filed writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Societies Challenging Police Station Construction on Amenity Plot. Construction of Police Station on Reserved Amenity Plot Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act and DCR.

The petitioners, three cooperative housing societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ petition challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...