Search Results for "Village Panchayats Meetings Rules 1959"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Procedural Irregularities Such as Lack of Proposer and Seconder and Secret Ballot Demand Found Not Fatal to the Motion's Validity as Majority Rule Prevails.

The petitioners, Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Rahuwadi, were elected from a body of eleven members. On 3rd October 2023, seven members s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Smt. Kalimun Balaso Nadaf, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Udgaon. Respondent Nos. 3 to 11 submitted resignations from the post of m...