Search Results for "Video Evidence"

1132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, 506(II) IPC and Section 67 IT Act Set Aside.

The case involves two appeals against conviction for gang rape and other offences. The prosecution alleged that on 16 May 2011, the appellants and thr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Dying Declaration and Recovery from Accused form key evidence in determining guilt under Section 302 IPC.

The appeal arose from the conviction of Basavaraj Jagaluru for the murder of Jagadish Shiraguppi, a blind man from Gadag. On 23 May 2015, Police Inspe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in POCSO Case for Rape of Six-Year-Old Girl — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Victim's Testimony and DNA Evidence. Victim's credible testimony and DNA evidence sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 376AB IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for the rape of a six-year-old girl. The victim, a first-standard student, was returning from a drawing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...