Search Results for "Victim compensation"

1300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. Father-Daughter Relationship Aggravates Offence; Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Sufficient for Conviction.

The appellant, Bandu Vishwanath Matte, was convicted by the Extra Joint District Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for POCSO Victim Under NALSA Scheme — Inadequate Compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 Enhanced to Rs. 10,50,000. The court held that the NALSA Scheme mandates minimum compensation of Rs. 7,00,000 for sexual assault victims, which can be enhanced by 50%.

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha, mother of a minor victim of sexual assault, filed an appeal under Section 372 CrPC challenging the adequacy of compensati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl - Upholds Conviction Under Sections 376, 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl on 5th September 2013. The victim, a student of ITI, was last seen by her mother at Asa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Sections 376 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated 24 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence of Accused in Rape of Minor Case from 10 Years to 7 Years. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony of 9-Year-Old Victim and Medical Evidence.

The judgment arises from two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.1172 of 2007 filed by the accused Pandurang Lalasaheb Yadav challenging his conviction and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 307 and 325 IPC in Water Dispute Assault Case. Conviction Stems from Incident Where Victim Suffered Severe Head Injuries Allegedly Caused by Spade and Stick.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, in Sessions Case No. 118 of 1993, where the two appellants were convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Pandurang Chikane, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of Malan Damodar Jadhav and senten...