Search Results for "Upfront Payment"

97 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Facilitates Settlement in Consumer Dispute Involving Flat Buyers, Builder, and Bank Under Consumer Protection Act. Court Records Amicable Resolution Terms Including Waiver of Charges, Interest Discounts, and Payment Adjustments, Directing Compliance with Timelines.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against a common judgment of the National Consumer Dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Telecom Infrastructure Charges Case Over Retrospective Application. Appellant's Circular Increasing Charges from 2009 Held Invalid as Yearly Payments Are Made Upfront, Making Retrospective Burden Unreasonable Under Interconnection Agreements.

The dispute arose from appeals filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. challenging a judgment by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI Circular on Resolution of Stressed Assets. Circular dated 12.02.2018 held to be valid and within RBI's powers under Sections 35A and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited and Jayaswal Holdings Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Chennai Allows Appeal of Financial Creditor in Insolvency Case, Directs Reconsideration of Resolution Plan. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Professional's failure to include the appellant in the Committee of Creditors and incorrect determination of voting shares violated the IBC, 2016.

The appeal was filed by RBL Bank Limited against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, which had approved the resolution pla...