NCLAT Chennai Allows Appeal of Financial Creditor in Insolvency Case, Directs Reconsideration of Resolution Plan. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Professional's failure to include the appellant in the Committee of Creditors and incorrect determination of voting shares violated the IBC, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by RBL Bank Limited against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, which had approved the resolution plan for Sical Logistics Limited. RBL Bank, a financial creditor, was not included in the Committee of Creditors (CoC) by the Resolution Professional (RP), Mr. Sripatham Venkatasubramanian Ramkumar. The RP had determined the voting shares based on incorrect financial debt amounts, excluding RBL Bank's claim. The NCLAT held that the RP's actions were contrary to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), and directed the CoC to reconsider the resolution plan with RBL Bank as a member and with corrected voting shares. The Tribunal set aside the NCLT order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Committee of Creditors - Inclusion of Financial Creditor - Section 21(2) IBC, 2016 - The RP must include all financial creditors in the CoC based on the financial debt owed to them. Failure to do so vitiates the CIRP process. (Paras 10-15)

B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Voting Share - Determination - Section 21(8) IBC, 2016 - The voting share of a financial creditor is determined by the proportion of its financial debt to the total financial debt of the corporate debtor. The RP's incorrect calculation of voting shares led to an erroneous approval of the resolution plan. (Paras 16-20)

C) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Resolution Plan - Approval - Section 30(2) IBC, 2016 - The CoC's approval of a resolution plan without the participation of a rightful financial creditor is invalid and must be reconsidered. (Paras 21-25)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Resolution Professional (RP) erred in not including RBL Bank as a member of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and in determining the voting share, and whether the approval of the resolution plan by the CoC without RBL Bank's participation is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLT order, and directed the CoC to reconsider the resolution plan with RBL Bank as a member and with corrected voting shares.

Law Points

  • Resolution Professional's duty to include all financial creditors in CoC
  • Voting share determination based on financial debt
  • CIRP regulations
  • Section 30(2) IBC
  • Section 60(5) IBC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 59

Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 36/2024

0000-00-00

RBL Bank Limited

Sical Logistics Limited, Mr. Sripatham Venkatasubramanian Ramkumar, Bank of Baroda, Yes Bank Limited, IDFC Bank Limited, Canara Bank Limited, UCO Bank Limited, IndusInd Bank Limited, SREI Equipment Finance Limited, Union Bank of India Limited, Axis Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order approving resolution plan under IBC

Remedy Sought

RBL Bank sought to be included in CoC and to have the resolution plan reconsidered with its participation

Filing Reason

RBL Bank was not included in the CoC by the RP, and its voting share was not considered

Previous Decisions

NCLT Chennai approved the resolution plan for Sical Logistics Limited

Issues

Whether the RP erred in not including RBL Bank in the CoC? Whether the voting share determination was correct? Whether the approval of the resolution plan without RBL Bank's participation is valid?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that it was a financial creditor and should have been included in the CoC. Respondents argued that the RP acted within his discretion and the plan was approved by the majority.

Ratio Decidendi

The Resolution Professional must include all financial creditors in the CoC and determine voting shares based on actual financial debt. Failure to do so renders the CIRP process invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The RP failed to include the appellant in the CoC, which is a clear violation of Section 21(2) of the IBC. The voting share determination was erroneous and needs to be rectified.

Procedural History

The NCLT Chennai approved the resolution plan for Sical Logistics Limited. RBL Bank appealed to NCLAT against the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 21(2), 21(8), 30(2), 60(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Dismissal of Bank Employee in Industrial Dispute — Labour Court Order Set Aside for Ignoring Complainant's Withdrawal and Failing to Consider Proportionality of Punishment. Termination of Sub-Staff Based on False Complain...
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Chennai Allows Appeal of Financial Creditor in Insolvency Case, Directs Reconsideration of Resolution Plan. The Tribunal held that the Resolution Professional's failure to include the appellant in the Committee of Creditors and incorrect determ...