Search Results for "UMA Investments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "UMA Investments"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Receiver in Family Property Dispute. Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case for Receiver When Property is in Possession of Defendants and Alternative Remedy of Partition is Available.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, filed a suit for partition and accounts against his family members, including his mother, brothers, sisters...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Leave and License Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Licensee Pending Suit. The court held that the licensee had a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favour, and the license was irrevocable under Section 60(b) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Wework India Management Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Wife as Guardian of Comatose Husband and Directs Banks to Release Funds for Treatment and Livelihood. Court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to appoint guardian for incapacitated person and issue mandamus to banks.

29 Apr 2025

The petitioner, Sandya Anilkumar, wife of Dr. Anil Kumar H.V., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Dispel Doubts. Court holds that propounders must prove due execution and testamentary capacity beyond suspicion, and failure to examine attesting witnesses or explain unnatural bequests leads to rejection of probate.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two testamentary proceedings: a Miscellaneous Petition No. 39 of 2004 in Testamentary Petition No. 233 of 2004 and a Testamentar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

7 Jan 2020

The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will and Codicil of Dr. Bharati Nanavati Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Execution. Court finds that the Will and Codicil were not proved in accordance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to lack of attesting witnesses and suspicious circumstances surrounding the documents.

22 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a Miscellaneous Petition (No. 39 of 2004) and a Testamentary Suit (No. 4 of 2005), both relating to the e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will Dated 1977 Despite Limitation and Forgery Challenges. Executor Succeeds in Proving Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity of Testator Who Died in 1979.

2 Dec 2016

The plaintiff, Suresh Manilal Mehta, filed a petition for probate of a Will dated 16th March 1977 allegedly executed by Rameshchandra Jamnadas Dalal (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.

7 Jan 2010

The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Order Challenging Injunction Against Builder's Construction on Redeveloped Plot. Consent of Flat Purchasers and Right to Use Additional FSI Questioned.

14 Jan 2010

The matter arose from a civil suit filed by forty-three flat purchasers against the promoter/builder, M/s. Noopur Developers, seeking a permanent inju...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)