High Court of Karnataka Appoints Wife as Guardian of Comatose Husband and Directs Banks to Release Funds for Treatment and Livelihood. Court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to appoint guardian for incapacitated person and issue mandamus to banks.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sandya Anilkumar, wife of Dr. Anil Kumar H.V., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking appointment as guardian of her husband, who had been lying in an ICU for more than 9 months in a comatose state on mechanical ventilation, unable to write or sign any papers. She also sought a writ of mandamus directing respondent banks (State Bank of India and Indian Overseas Bank) to allow her to withdraw money from her husband's accounts for his day-to-day treatment and their livelihood. The court heard the counsel for the petitioner, the High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 (Chief Secretary), and the advocates for respondent No.2 and respondent No.4. The court, exercising its parens patriae jurisdiction, appointed the petitioner as the guardian of her husband and directed the banks to permit her to withdraw funds from his accounts for his treatment and their livelihood. The order was made on 29th April 2025.

Headnote

A) Guardianship - Comatose Spouse - Appointment of Guardian - No specific statute - Court exercising parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner sought appointment as guardian of her husband who was in ICU for over 9 months in comatose state on mechanical ventilation - Court held that in the absence of any statutory provision, the court has inherent power to appoint a guardian for a person who is incapacitated and unable to manage his affairs - Petitioner appointed as guardian of her husband Dr. Anil Kumar H.V. (Paras 1-3)

B) Banking - Access to Funds - Writ of Mandamus - Petitioner sought direction to banks to allow her to withdraw money from her husband's accounts for his treatment and livelihood - Court held that since the petitioner is appointed as guardian, she is entitled to operate the accounts for the benefit of her husband - Directed respondent banks to allow the petitioner to withdraw funds from the accounts of Dr. Anil Kumar H.V. for his treatment and their livelihood (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court can appoint the wife as guardian of her comatose husband and direct banks to allow her to withdraw funds from his accounts for his treatment and their livelihood.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, appointing the petitioner as guardian of her husband Dr. Anil Kumar H.V., and directed respondent banks (R2 to R4) to permit the petitioner to withdraw money from the accounts of Dr. Anil Kumar H.V. for his treatment and their livelihood.

Law Points

  • Guardianship of comatose spouse
  • writ of mandamus
  • bank account access for medical treatment
  • parens patriae jurisdiction
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (04) 48

WP No. 10453 of 2025 (GM-RES)

2025-04-29

M. Nagaprasanna

NC: 2025:KHC:17786

H. Venkatesha Dodderi (for petitioner), Shamanth Naik (HCGP for R1), Divya Purandar (for R2), Keerthi Kumar D. Naik (for R4)

Sandya Anilkumar

The Chief Secretary, Government of Karnataka; The Branch Manager, State Bank of India (M.S. Building); The Branch Manager, State Bank of India (Sagara Road Branch); The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking appointment of guardian and direction to banks to allow withdrawal of funds for treatment and livelihood.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks appointment as guardian of her husband Dr. Anil Kumar H.V. and a writ of mandamus directing respondent banks to allow her to withdraw money from his accounts for his treatment and their livelihood.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's husband is in ICU for over 9 months in comatose state on mechanical ventilation, unable to write or sign papers, and petitioner needs to access his bank accounts for his treatment and their livelihood.

Issues

Whether the court can appoint the wife as guardian of her comatose husband in the absence of a specific statute. Whether the court can issue a writ of mandamus directing banks to allow the guardian to withdraw funds from the incapacitated person's accounts.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the husband is in a comatose state and unable to manage his affairs, and the petitioner needs to be appointed as guardian to access his bank accounts for treatment and livelihood. Respondents did not oppose the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of a specific statutory provision, the court has inherent parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to appoint a guardian for a person who is incapacitated and unable to manage his affairs, and to issue directions to banks to allow the guardian to access funds for the benefit of the incapacitated person.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayers: i. To appoint the Petitioner as Guardian of her husband Dr. Anil Kumar H.V., who is still lying in a I.C.U for more than 9 months and cannot write and sign any papers, comatose state an intensive care unit on mechanical ventilation. ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus against Respondents N.2 to 4 allow the Petitioner to draw the money for day-today- treatment and for their livelihood.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date and came up for preliminary hearing on 29th April 2025, when the court passed the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Retailers in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Appoints Wife as Guardian of Comatose Husband and Directs Banks to Release Funds for Treatment and Livelihood. Court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to appoint guardian for ...