Search Results for "Trade Union Act, 1926"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Trade Union Act, 1926"

166 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Finds Industrial Court's Order Erroneous for Reading Unproved Consent Certificate Under Section 28(1A) of Trade Union Act. Failure to Prove Consent Certificate as Required by Section 28(1A) of Trade Union Act, 1926 Renders Industrial Court Proceeding Without Jurisdiction.

21 Dec 2010

The petitioner, Arun Asatkar, was a member of the Nagpur Union of Working Journalists since 1978 and worked at Lokmat newspaper. A dispute arose regar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Consent Certificate in Trade Union Dispute Due to Lack of Enquiry Under Section 28(1-A) of Trade Unions Act, 1926. Registrar's Failure to Conduct Proper Enquiry Before Issuing Corrected Consent Certificate Violates Statutory Mandate.

17 Dec 2015

The petitioners, Koyla Shramik Sabha (a registered trade union) and its President Umashankar Gupteshwar Prasad Singh, challenged the consent certifica...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.

22 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pilots' Union to Operate, Quashes Suspension of Registration by Industrial Tribunal. The Court held that the Industrial Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 by suspending registration and restraining the union from raising industrial disputes, as such powers are not conferred by the Act.

27 Nov 2013

The Petitioner, National Aviators Guild, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, comprising about 117 pilots of Jet Airways (India)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Holding Unrecognised Union Cannot Maintain Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court ruled that only a recognised union has locus standi to file a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 for items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

18 Dec 2015

The case involves an appeal by Ballarpur Industries Limited (appellant) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 May 2018

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Audit and Bye-law Requirements under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Industrial Court's order confirming cancellation of registration under Section 10(b) for failure to get accounts audited, maintain proper membership records, and follow bye-laws was upheld.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Solapur District Central Cooperative Bank Employees Union, challenged the order dated 19.07.2016 passed by the Industrial Court, Solap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees - Transfer Order Not Shown to Be Mala Fide or Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU and PULP Act. The court held that the union failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971, as the transfer was a routine management decision.

15 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)