Search Results for "Testimony of prosecutrix"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Raping Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. Court Relies on Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence to Affirm Conviction Under Sections 376(2), 313 IPC and Sections 5(j)(ii)(l)(n) r/w 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Samji s/o Isarya Gavit, was convicted by the Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 16 of 2015 for offences under Section 376(2) and Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Ganesh Pralhad Sontakke, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nagpur, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Ashpak Lalmohammad Mohammad Ansari, was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape and sentenced to ten y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 417, and 109 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Inconsistent and Not Credible.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inherent Improbability and False Implication — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside on Grounds of Preponderance of Probabilities.

The appellant, Rajesh s/o Kewalramji Chute, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for offences under Section 376 IPC (rape) and Section 506 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and POCSO Act. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Ranjit Ghutke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the rape of a 13-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations of Intercourse Under Section 376(g) IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five accused persons charged with gang rape under Section 376(g) of the Indian Penal Code. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's version was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible intercourse.

The appellant, Udhavsingh @ Mannu Kisansing Babawale, was convicted by the VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the offence of rape under Sect...