NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019...
Search Results for "TTC Industrial Area"
36 result(s) found
Found 36 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. The Court held that the Tribunal must consider prima facie case, balance of convenience, and financial hardship while deciding waiver of predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
1 Mar 2012The appellant, Hyva (India) Private Limited, is engaged in body building on motor vehicle chassis supplied by Tata Motors Limited. Tata Motors clears ...
- 177
High Court
High Court of Bombay Makes Rule Returnable in Writs Seeking Compliance with RBI Master Circular on Loan Restructuring. Petitioners Allege Inability to Comply with Loan Obligations Due to Telecom Industry Downturn, Seek Direction to Banks Under Paragraph 6.4 of RBI Master Circular Dated 1 July 2015.
3 Feb 2020The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2019, GTL Infrastructure Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petit...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Avail Services of Legal Practitioner in Domestic Inquiry - Right to Representation Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that refusal to permit legal representation violates principles of natural justice.
8 Jan 2024The petitioner, Ajit Bhagwan Sawant, a workman employed by M/s. Parveen Industries Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to a domestic inquiry by the employer. The...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.
10 Apr 2024The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...
- 23
High Court
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.
30 Oct 2015The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Orders Unsealing of Premises in Customs Investigation — Power to Search Does Not Include Power to Seal Under Section 105 of Customs Act, 1962. Sealing of Office Premises Without Express Statutory Authority Held Illegal; Respondents Permitted to Conduct Confined Search.
25 Jul 2023The petitioner, M/s. Narayan Power Solutions, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the sealing of its office premises by the...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Recall of Winding-Up Order in Company Law Dispute. Ex-Director Lacked Locus Standi and Application Was Barred by Delay and Laches Under Companies Act, 1956.
13 Nov 2017The appeal arose from an order dated 22/02/2017 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which allowed Company Application No.448 of...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bharti Airtel's Challenge to Tender for Bandwidth Services — Eligibility Condition Requiring Government Experience Upheld. Court Holds That Tender Conditions Are Not Open to Judicial Review Unless Arbitrary or Mala Fide, and the Condition Was Rationally Connected to the Object of the Tender Under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
19 Aug 2019The petitioners, Bharti Airtel Limited and its officer, challenged a tender issued by Maharashtra Information Technology Corporation Limited (MahaIT) ...
- 125
