Search Results for "TDS delay"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award Setting Aside Penalties, Termination, and Blacklisting in Sewerage Treatment Plant Contract Dispute

The High Court of Bombay heard cross-petitions challenging an arbitral award dated 18 June 2020 in a dispute between Solapur Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Arrears of Rent and Interest. Defendant failed to prove payment of rent for disputed period; plaintiff entitled to recovery of Rs.6,29,249/- with interest at 6% p.a. from date of suit till realization.

The present Regular First Appeal was filed by the defendant, M/s. Hinduja Fashions, against the judgment and decree dated 6.11.2015 passed by the VII ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Income Tax Return for Refund Claim. CBDT's Rejection of Condonation Application Set Aside as Reasons for Delay Were Genuine and Not Habitual.

The petitioner, Artist Tree Pvt. Ltd., engaged in dealing in artifacts and finances, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 1997-1998 on 14 Sept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of TDS Refund Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Failed to Establish That Payments to Foreign Collaborator Were Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) Read with DTAA.

The petitioners, M/s BASF (India) Limited and Mr. P.A. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28th February 2001 passed by the Co...