Search Results for "Special Meeting"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Special Meeting"

3091 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3091 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

16 Jul 2012

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. The Court held that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 excludes the date of receipt of the notice, validating the special meeting held on the seventh day.

5 Nov 2014

The case pertains to a no-confidence motion moved against the Sarpanch of Belgaon-Kelgaon Gram Panchayat. The petitioners, six out of nine members, su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

17 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Meeting — Fresh Meeting Barred Within One Year Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that the embargo on holding a fresh no confidence motion meeting applies for a full year from the date of the last meeting, and a meeting held exactly one year later is not permissible.

21 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Laxmibai Kiran Jaiswar, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kankrala. Certain members of the Grampanchayat sought to move a No Conf...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction EGM in Company Dispute. Court Holds That Requisition for EGM Under Section 169 of Companies Act, 1956 Is Valid Despite Pending Oppression Petitions and That Board's Failure to Call Meeting Within 21 Days Entitles Requisitionists to Call Meeting Themselves.

24 Jul 2013

The case involves a dispute between two groups of shareholders in Man Industries (I) Ltd., represented by two brothers, Ramesh Mansukhani (supporting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Chairman of APMC Katol for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Notice Issued on 02.12.2013 for Meeting on 12.12.2013 Held Invalid as It Did Not Provide 15 Clear Days' Notice as Required by Rule 14(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Katol, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2013 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Orders Setting Aside No-Confidence Motions Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat. The Core Issue Involved Validity of Service of Notice and Procedural Compliance Under Bombay Village Panchayat Sarpanch and UpSarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975.

8 Feb 2013

The writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged concurrent orders of the Additional Collector, Parbhani and the Divisiona...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Validity of Special General Meeting Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Town Panchayat President Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. The court considered precedents to determine if the 10-day notice requirement under Section 42(9) proviso is mandatory or directory.

23 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Smt Damayanthi, was the elected President of Vitla Town Panchayat, having assumed charge on 16.01.2019 after an election. The Town Pan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)