Search Results for "Seeds Inspector"

53 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Insecticides Act for Lack of Sanction — Prosecution Initiated Without Mandatory Consent Under Section 31(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 Is Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, B.S. Suresh Babu, proprietor of Karnataka Traders, filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Managing Director in Seeds Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 6(a) read with Section 19(a) of Seeds Act, 1966 fails to disclose role of petitioner as Managing Director.

The petitioner, Rafel Del Riyo, Managing Director of Syngenta India Limited, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Failure to Record Information and Forward Report to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal.

The appellant, Dnyandeo s/o Atmaram Aswar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions Trial No. 8/2002 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Loss of Right to Re-test Sample. Applicant's Right Under Section 16(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 to Send Sample to Central Seed Testing Laboratory Lost as Shelf Life of Seed Expired Before Complaint Filed.

The applicant, Regional Manager of Prabhat Agri Bio-Tech Ltd., challenged criminal proceedings in S.C.C. No. 313 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Seeds Act Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Give Notice Under Rule 7(1) of Seeds Rules, 1968 Before Drawing Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Vishwas Pandhari Khuje, Rajendra Bhikanrao Deshmukh, and Ramdas Dnyandev Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seed Quality Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Seeds Act, 1966. Police Investigation into Seed Quality Without Complaint by Seed Inspector Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioners, Padmakar Haribhau Mulay and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the FIR and charge-sheet in R.C.C.No.276/2000 pending ...