Search Results for "Section 95-A MHADA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Section 95-A MHADA"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Right to Reside in Matrimonial Home Under MHADA Scheme — Emphasizes Rehabilitation of Dishoused Occupiers. The Court held that the wife's right to residence is not absolute and must be balanced with the rights of co-owners and the terms of the redevelopment agreement under Section 95-A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

27 Apr 2020

The appellant, Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking enforcement of her right to reside in her matrimoni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

30 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Scheme. Petitioners, Tenement Owners, Opposed Redevelopment by Developer Appointed by Majority of Society Members and Sought Quashing of Eviction Order and Declaration that Scheme Is Illegal.

24 Apr 2012

The petitioners, eight members and owners of tenements in Chitranjan Nagar Vidya Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (East), Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petitions Against Slum Rehabilitation Permissions — Earlier Appeals Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Dismissed. Developer Contends Petitioners Lack Locus Standi as Only Minority of Society Members Objected.

14 Jul 2010

The case involved two writ petitions filed by certain members of registered co-operative housing societies, namely Hanuman Hitwardhak SRA CHS Ltd., Ek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Eviction of Tenant Refusing to Vacate Dilapidated Building in Cluster Development Project; Allows Police Assistance. Tenant’s Non-Cooperation in Redevelopment Project Leads to Order of Eviction Using MHADA’s Powers Under Section 77 of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

17 Jul 2017

The petitioners, trustees of Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust, a public charitable trust, filed a writ petition seeking eviction of respondent No. 3, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

20 Mar 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

6 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)