Search Results for "Section 37 appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 37 appeal"

30 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Second Round of Arbitration — No Arbitration Agreement Survives After Award Set Aside Without Remand. The court held that after an arbitral award is set aside under Section 34 without any direction for de novo arbitration, the arbitration agreement does not revive for a fresh round of arbitration, and a pending Section 37 appeal does not alter this position.

10 Oct 2025

The dispute arose from an Agreement for Purchase of Salvage Material dated 29th November 2011 between Rajuram Sawaji Purohit, sole proprietor of M/s. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of A&C Act. The Court upheld the arbitral award and the commercial court's judgment, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the findings regarding breach of contract and quantum of damages.

31 Jul 2025

The appellant, M/s. Bioelectric Private Limited, filed a commercial appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, read ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses regarding fixed and variable costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

23 Sep 2022

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a Single Judge's order dismissing a Section 34 pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

20 Apr 2021

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Bridge Construction — Interest Rate Reduction from 25% to 18% per annum Upheld. The court held that the District Judge's modification of future interest was within permissible limits under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the award did not contravene public policy.

18 Feb 2021

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a dispute between the State of Maharashtra (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 34 Application — Arbitral Award Not Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the dismissal of the challenge to the arbitral award, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Oct 2019

The appeal was filed by the Chief Commercial Manager/FM, South Western Railway, representing the Union of India, against the judgment dated 23/9/2017 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Flat Purchase Dispute — Time Was Essence of Contract. Appellant failed to pay balance consideration within stipulated time; arbitrator's award of interest and costs upheld under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Sep 2019

The appellant, Mr. Nirmal Sureka, entered into two agreements on 26.11.1999 with respondent nos. 1 and 2 (Alankar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. and Hotel Amar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds award as not patently illegal or against public policy, confirming that findings of fact by arbitrator are final.

6 Jan 2016

The appellant, M/s. Karnataka Soaps and Detergents Limited, a Government of Karnataka undertaking, was aggrieved by the judgment dated 03.12.2009 pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition by City Civil Court, Holding City Civil Court is Not a 'Court' Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration Act. The Court set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the proper court.

2 Mar 2012

The appellant, a share broker, purchased 100 shares of Odyssey Technology Limited on behalf of a client. The shares were sent for registration but onl...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)