Search Results for "Section 29-A"

135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Commercial Court Order on Arbitration Time Extension Application. Commercial Court Erred in Declining Jurisdiction Over Section 29A Application Based on Arbitrator Appointment Method Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.08.2025 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Previous Arbitrator's Withdrawal Due to Ill Health

The High Court of Bombay heard two commercial arbitration applications filed by Applicants seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Execution Orders in Arbitration Award Enforcement — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Objections. Court holds that execution court must consider objections under Section 47 CPC before ordering sale of judgment debtor's property.

The petitioner, Sri Ashish K. Philip, was the judgment debtor in execution proceedings arising out of an arbitration award in favor of the respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...