Search Results for "Section 25(3) Limitation Act"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Appeal. Delay of 718 days not sufficiently explained; mere administrative procedure not a valid ground for condonation.

The present application was filed by the Superintending Archaeologist seeking condonation of 718 days delay in filing the First Appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Contract Dispute — Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Failure to Frame Issues and Conduct Trial Rendered Decree Unsustainable Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.

The present Commercial Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 09/08/2019 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Jalna, in Commercial Suit No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that dismissal of restitution application under Section 144(1) CPC does not bar a fresh suit for possession based on independent title.

The case involves a property dispute over a house and land at Survey No. 123, Block No. 276, village Atyal, taluka Gadhinglaj. The respondents (origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and no perversity is shown.

The case is a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The appellants, Chatur Khandu Patil and others, were the defendants in a suit filed by th...