Search Results for "Section 2(31)"

403 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 403 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Land Dispute — Petitioner Fails to Prove Deemed Purchase Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Mere Revenue Entry as 'Kabjedar' Insufficient to Establish Tenancy Rights; Inordinate Delay in Filing Revision Also Fatal.

The petitioner, Shri Vitthal Maruti Bulunge, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BMC to Provide Alternate Premises to Disabled Petitioner After Illegal Demolition of Stall. License Under Section 394 of MMC Act, 1888 Does Not Authorize Structure on Public Land, but Demolition Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Mohd. Sayed Mohd. Salim Nagori Rizvi, a person with 100% hearing disability, filed a writ petition seeking reconstruction of his stall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Tribunal's Award for Injuries Sustained in Hit-and-Run Accident. Delay in Filing FIR Does Not Discredit Claim When Medical Evidence and Other Circumstances Corroborate the Accident.

The appeal was filed by the insurer, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., challenging the judgment and award dated 05.07.2012 passed by the Addl. Senior C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Reduces Compensation for Bullock Cart Owner Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's contributory negligence established as bullock cart was parked on highway without lights, violating Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 28.08.2007 on Harihar-Shimoga Road near Bannikodu cross. The appellant, Thyagaraj, was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Magistrate's Refusal to Release Accused Under Section 169 CrPC in Unlawful Activities Case. The court held that once police find no sufficient evidence, Magistrate cannot order further investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and must release the accused.

The petitioners, along with one Abdul Aahad, were accused in Crime No. 3065/2009 registered at Murtizapur Police Station for offences under the Unlawf...