Search Results for "Section 193 CrPC"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Further Investigation Order in Rape Case After Closure Report Acceptance -- Police Cannot Conduct Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) of CrPC Without Magistrate's Leave

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the High Court's refusal to quash police orders for further investigation in a rape case after a closu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in CBI Cyber Fraud Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days Under Section 187(2) BNSS. Appellant Granted Default Bail as Investigation Not Concluded Within Statutory Period of 60 Days from First Remand.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Shaurya Sunil Kumar Singh against the dismissal of his default bail plea by the Bombay High Court. The appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summons Against Accused Not Named in Police Report Under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC. Magistrate Cannot Summon Persons Not Named in Police Report or Column (2) of Report, Proper Course is Under Section 319 CrPC After Evidence Collection.

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal concerning the power of a Magistrate to summon an individual not named in a police report under Section 190(1)(b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Under Section 193 IPC Against Accused in False Statement Case — Statements Made in Departmental Enquiry Not Before Court of Law. Section 193 IPC Requires False Evidence in Judicial Proceedings; Statements Before Departmental Enquiry Do Not Attract Offence.

The petitioner, Appasaheb Baburao Shinde, was the original accused No.4 in a complaint filed by respondent No.2, Sachin Mahadeo Vaidya, before the Jud...