Search Results for "Section 149(3)"

45 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condition on Scheduled Tribe Certificate Validity. Petitioner's Gond Tribe Not Recognized as Scheduled Tribe in State of Origin, Hence No Entitlement to Concessions in Maharashtra Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Premlal s/o Poonamsingh Maria, was issued a caste certificate on 21-6-1988 by the Executive Magistrate, Nagpur, certifying him as belo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Transfer to Aided Posts on 100% Grant-in-Aid Basis — Prior Service on Unaided Division Counts for Regular Pay Scale. Teachers Transferred Within Same School Entitled to Full Grant-in-Aid, Not Shikshan Sevak Status.

The petitioners, five teachers, were initially appointed as Assistant Teachers on the unaided division of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 schools on 01.02.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Transfer from Unaided to Aided School of Same Management - Approval Must Be Granted Under MEPS Rules. Transfer from unaided to aided section of same school is permissible under Rule 12(2) and Rule 41 of MEPS Rules, 1981; refusal by Education Officer quashed.

The petitioner, Ajay Vishwanath Kharade, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the unaided section of Sant Dnyaneshwar Primary Vidyamandir, run by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Bank for Alleged Non-Compliance of Terminal Benefits Order. Bank's Affidavit Shows Payment of Eligible Benefits and No Wilful Disobedience Found Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Background: The contempt petition arose from an alleged non-compliance of a Division Bench order in W.A.No.1493 of 2014 dated 26.03.2024, concerning t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Teacher Challenging Discontinuation of Salary by Education Officer. Appointment Approved on Non-Aided Basis Prior to School Receiving Grant-in-Aid Cannot Be Retrospectively Invalidated for Lack of D.Ed. Qualification.

The petitioner, Sayas s/o Nagnath Surnar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher by Respondent No. 3 Management on 11.06.2011 and posted at Respondent ...