Search Results for "Section 13(1)"

1508 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1508 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020032022013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Modvat Credit Lapse Provisions in Finance Act, 1999. Retrospective Validation of Rules Causing Lapse of Accumulated Credit Upheld as Within Legislative Competence and Not Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, Coral Cosmetics Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered as a Small Scale Industry, was engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2018

The matter arises from a writ petition filed by Mandhana Industries Ltd, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, against an order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Legality of Re-opening Assessment Under Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Examines Whether Proceedings Initiated Under Substituted Sections 147-151 After Finance Act Amendment Are Valid for Assessment Year 2013-14.

In this writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, the petitioner, an individual assessee, challenged the revenue's action of reopening his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...