KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Section 105 CPC"
397 result(s) found
Found 397 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court Decision and Upholds Dismissal of Second Suit on Grounds of Res Judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC. The Court held that the second suit was barred as it involved the same parties, subject matter, and cause of action as the first suit, and the High Court erred in interfering with concurrent findings under Section 100 CPC.
9 Apr 2026The dispute originated from an adoption deed dated March 23, 1961, where Respondent allegedly adopted Channappa. In 2002, Respondent filed Suit-I (O.S...
- 649
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Condonation of Delay in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Liberal Approach Justified by Sufficient Cause and Prejudice Avoidance. The court held that the Trial Court's discretion to condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, read with Order IX Rule 13 CPC, was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 115 CPC.
18 Nov 2025The case arises from a partition suit filed by Hiraman Nivrutti Tupe (Applicant No.1) against his father, mother, and brothers, including Ratan Nivrut...
- 119
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition, Sets Aside Executing Court's Order Condoning Delay in Restoration of Execution Petition. Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Orders Beyond 30 Days.
9 Jan 2026The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased judgment-debtor (Padasaib) challenging an order of the ...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Transfer Petition Under Section 24 CPC Seeking Transfer of DV Act Case to Family Court — Metropolitan Magistrate Not Subordinate to High Court Under CPC. Transfer Under Article 227 Also Denied as Proceedings Were at Advanced Stage and No Prejudice Shown.
10 Dec 2015The applicant wife filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and also invoked Article 227 of the ...
- 147
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Trial Court Order on Impleading Parties in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Upholds Order Allowing Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers as Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
29 Jun 2022The petitioner, H.P. Subbareddy, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable properties. During the pendency o...
- 137
High Court
High Court of Bombay Division Bench Hears Reference on Appealability of Interim Injunction Orders in Regular Civil Appeals. Reference Concerns Whether Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC Covers Interim Injunctions Granted by First Appellate Courts Under Order 41 CPC.
17 Sep 2018This matter came before a Division Bench as a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the High Court who doubted the correctness of earlier single...
- 42
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Companies Act and SEBI Regulations Jurisdiction Dispute. The court held that rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is summary and not for contested facts, and SEBI has exclusive jurisdiction over violations of its regulations, not the National Company Law Tribunal.
4 Jan 2023The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal concerning the rectificatory jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 59 of the Comp...
- 251
Tribunals
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.
1 Jan 1970The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.
17 Sep 2024The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...
- 13
