WA No. 2929 of 2023
20 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Salem District"
183 result(s) found
Found 183 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Cart-Track Public Road in Land Encroachment Case — Upholds District Collector's Order Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Cart-track even in patta land is Government land; encroachments must be removed following procedures under Sections 6 and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.
29 Apr 2026The writ petition was filed by M.Suresh seeking a mandamus to direct respondents 2 to 4 (District Collector, Tahsildar, and Village Administrative Off...
- 45
High Court
Madras High Court Closes Writ Petitions Seeking Natham Settlement Scheme Implementation in Elampillai Village, Salem District, Following Earlier Order in Related Matters. Court disposes of petitions without costs, relying on order in WP Nos. 35151 to 35157 of 2005 dated 02.04.2026.
2 Apr 2026The petitioner, M.Selvaraj, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the respondents to implement the Natham Settleme...
- 56
High Court
Madras High Court Upholds Differential Fee Structure for Government Quota MBBS Seats in Government Medical College and Hospital (Formerly Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital) — Clause 3(iii) of G.O.Ms.No.204 Higher Education (H1) Department, dated 26.10.2021, Held Valid and Not Discriminatory. The court held that the classification between students of this college and other government medical colleges is based on intelligible differentia and has a rational nexus with the object of ensuring financial viability and quality of education.
26 Mar 2026The batch of writ petitions challenged Clause 3(iii) of G.O.Ms.No.204, Higher Education (H1) Department, dated 26.10.2021, which fixed a higher fee st...
- 48
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Suit Barred Under Section 14. Civil suit challenging notice under Section 7 of the Act is barred by Section 14, and the suit having been dismissed, authorities must proceed with enforcement within twelve weeks.
24 Mar 2026The petitioner, M.Raju, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a memo dated 19....
- 16
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process.
11 Mar 2026The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (third res...
- 30
High Court
High Court of Madras Hears Challenge to Rejection of Land Use Conversion Application Under Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use Rules, 2017. Petitioner Sought Quashing of Panchayat President's Order Dated 25.04.2024 and Direction to Forward Application Under Rule 4.
14 Feb 2025The petitioner, Dr. Ramakrishnan, owned 6.31 acres of agricultural land in Modakkupatti Village, Salem District. He applied for conversion of the land...
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.
24 Jan 2025The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...
- 26
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.
24 Jan 2025The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.
7 Apr 2021The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...
- 13
