Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Suit Barred Under Section 14. Civil suit challenging notice under Section 7 of the Act is barred by Section 14, and the suit having been dismissed, authorities must proceed with enforcement within twelve weeks.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M.Raju, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a memo dated 19.07.2019 issued by the Tahsildar (third respondent). The memo stated that a civil suit had been instituted challenging a notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905). The petitioner sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the memo and to direct respondents 1 to 6 to remove encroachments in Survey Nos.55/3A and 55/3B, Kaligoundampalayam, Sankari Taluk, Salem District. The court noted that under Section 14 of the 1905 Act, a suit challenging such a notice is expressly barred. It was also brought to the court's notice that the suit had already been dismissed. Consequently, there was no impediment for the authorities to proceed with enforcement action for removal of encroachments by following the procedure under the Act. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that encroachments had already been identified by the competent authorities. In view of this, the court directed the official respondents to complete the enforcement actions within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Encroachment - Bar of Suit - Section 14, Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - The court considered whether a civil suit challenging a notice under Section 7 of the Act is maintainable. Held that Section 14 expressly bars such suits, and the suit filed was already dismissed. Therefore, authorities are free to proceed with removal of encroachments following the procedure under the Act (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a civil suit challenging a notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 is maintainable in view of Section 14 of the Act

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to complete enforcement actions for removal of encroachments within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 14 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act
  • 1905 bars civil suits against notices under Section 7
  • Enforcement action must follow procedure under 1905 Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (03) 127

W.P.No.7945 of 2023

2026-03-24

S.M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy for petitioner, Mr.T.Arun Kumar (Additional Government Pleader) for R1 to R6, Ms.P.Ruthistra for Mr.B.Jawahar for R7 and R8

M.Raju

The District Collector, Salem District; The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sankari; The Tahsildar, Sankari Taluk; The Revenue Inspector, Sankarapuram; The Block Development Officer, Mahudanchavadi; The President, Kaligoundamapalayam Panchayat; Kandasamy; Mathiyalagan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a memo issued by the Tahsildar regarding a suit filed against a notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the memo dated 19.07.2019 and a direction to respondents 1 to 6 to remove encroachments in S.Nos.55/3A and 55/3B, Kaligoundampalayam, Sankari Taluk, Salem District.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the memo stating that a suit had been instituted against a notice under Section 7 of the 1905 Act, which the petitioner believed was an impediment to removal of encroachments.

Previous Decisions

The suit challenging the notice under Section 7 had already been dismissed.

Issues

Whether a civil suit challenging a notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 is maintainable in view of Section 14 of the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that encroachments have already been identified by the competent authorities.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 14 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 expressly bars civil suits against notices issued under Section 7 of the Act. Once the suit is dismissed, there is no impediment for authorities to proceed with enforcement action for removal of encroachments following the procedure under the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

Under Section 14 of 1905 Act, the suit is expressly barred and it is also brought to the notice of this Court that the said suit has already been dismissed. Thus, there is no impediment for the authorities to proceed with enforcement action for removal of encroachments by following the procedure as contemplated under the 1905 Act.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.No.7945 of 2023 before the Madras High Court challenging a memo dated 19.07.2019 issued by the Tahsildar. The court heard the matter and disposed of it on 24.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905: Section 7, Section 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Not Liable as Vehicle Was Stolen at Time of Accident. Owner's Failure to Produce Insurance Policy Does Not Shift Liability When Vehicle Was Not in His Possession and No ...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Partly Allows Insurer Appeal and Dismisses Claimant Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case. Tribunal's Finding of Negligence and Liability Against Insurer Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, but Final Quantum Not Determine...