High Court of Madras Hears Challenge to Rejection of Land Use Conversion Application Under Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use Rules, 2017. Petitioner Sought Quashing of Panchayat President's Order Dated 25.04.2024 and Direction to Forward Application Under Rule 4.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Ramakrishnan, owned 6.31 acres of agricultural land in Modakkupatti Village, Salem District. He applied for conversion of the land from agriculture to non-agriculture purposes under the Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use (From Agriculture to Non-Agriculture Purposes in Non-Planning Areas) Rules, 2017. The petitioner obtained necessary no-objection certificates from the Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Service and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. However, the first respondent, the President of Manmalai Panchayat Union, did not forward the application as required under Rule 4 of the 2017 Rules. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the proceedings of the first respondent dated 25.04.2024 and a direction to forward his application. Neighbouring land owners (impleaded as respondents 6 to 12) opposed the petition, arguing that conversion would harm agricultural activities in the locality and that the petitioner had not secured prior approval from the Panchayat or concurrence from the District Collector and the Director of Town and Country Planning. The government authorities (respondents 3 to 5) cited the procedural requirements under Section 47A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and a relevant Government Order. The High Court of Madras heard arguments from all sides. The judgment text provided does not contain the final reasoned decision or operative directions of the court.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Conversion of Agricultural Land - Rule 4 of Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use (From Agriculture to Non-Agriculture Purposes in Non-Planning Areas) Rules, 2017 - The petitioner, owner of 6.31 acres, applied for conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purposes in a non-planning area. The Panchayat President did not forward the application despite the petitioner obtaining no-objection certificates from Fire and Rescue Services and Pollution Control Board. The writ petition challenged the inaction and sought mandamus for forwarding the application (Paras 2-3).

B) Administrative Law - Local Body Approvals - Prior consent from Panchayat and concurrence from District Collector and Director of Town and Country Planning - The impleaded respondents, neighbouring agriculturists, contended that the land conversion would adversely affect agricultural activities in the locality and that the petitioner had failed to obtain prior approval from the Panchayat and concurrence from the District Collector and Director of Town and Country Planning. Reference was also made to procedures under Section 47A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and a Government Order (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proceedings of the Panchayat President dated 25.04.2024 rejecting or not forwarding the petitioner's land use conversion application are sustainable; whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to have his application forwarded under Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use (From Agriculture to Non-Agriculture Purposes in Non-Planning Areas) Rules, 2017.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Mandatory forwarding of application under Rule 4
  • Requirement of no-objection certificates for land conversion
  • Consideration of objections from neighbouring agriculturists
  • Compliance with prior approvals from Panchayat and District Collector
  • Applicability of Section 47A of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act
  • 1971
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 193

WP No. 28362 of 2024 and WMP Nos. 30927, 30929 of 2024

2025-02-14

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

2025:MHC:721

Mr. S. Ilamvaludhi, Mr. B. Sanjay Balachnader, Mr. S. Yaswanth, M/s. S. Senthil, Mr. T. Chandrasekaran, Ms. A. Pramila

Dr. Ramakrishnan

The President, Manmalai Panchayat Union and others (M. Bhuvaneshwari, District Collector, Assistant Director of Town Panchayates, Assistant Director of Town and Country Planning, K. Senthilkumar, Meenakshi, V. Avaranam, R. Karthick @ Jayaprakash, K. Mani, S. Sellamuthu, A. Suresh)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ of certiorari and mandamus challenging the Panchayat President's order dated 25.04.2024 and seeking direction to forward the petitioner's application for land use conversion.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the proceedings of the first respondent dated 25.04.2024 and a direction to the first respondent to forward the petitioner's application under Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use Rules, 2017.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's application for conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use was not acted upon or forwarded by the Panchayat President despite the petitioner obtaining required no-objection certificates.

Issues

Whether the proceedings of the Panchayat President dated 25.04.2024 are legally sustainable. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a mandamus directing the first respondent to forward his land use conversion application under Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use Rules, 2017. Whether the petitioner had complied with all necessary prior approvals and objections from neighbouring land owners.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contended that he had obtained no-objection certificates from the Fire and Rescue Service and Pollution Control Board, and all necessary documents were submitted, but no action was taken on his application. Impleaded respondents (neighbouring agriculturists) argued that land conversion would adversely affect agricultural activities in the locality and that the petitioner had not obtained prior approval from the Panchayat or concurrence from the District Collector and Director of Town and Country Planning. Government authorities referred to the procedural requirements under Section 47A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and a Government Order, opposing the petition.

Judgment Excerpts

The proceedings of the 1st respondent/President, Manmalai Panchayat Union, Sentharapatti Post, Gingavalli Taluk, Salem District dated 25.04.2024 is sought to be assailed in the present writ petition. The petitioner states that he is the owner of the land measuring to an extent of 6.31 acres situated at Modakkupatti Village and has applied for conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purposes in non-planning areas. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that the petitioner has obtained necessary certificates from the competent authorities, including no objection certificates from Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Service and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the impleaded respondents 6 to 12 would submit that the impleaded respondents are neighbouring land owners utilising their lands for agricultural purposes. In the event of granting permission for converting agricultural land to non-agricultural land would affect the agricultural activities in that locality. It is further contended that the petitioner had not obtained prior approval from the Panchayat, nor concurrence from the District Collector and Director of Town and Country Planning. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 3 to 5 would oppose by stating that the procedures as contemplated under Section 47A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, and the Government order passed in G.O.Ms.No...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking to quash the Panchayat President's order dated 25.04.2024 and direction to forward his application under Rule 4. Respondents 6 to 12 were impleaded as neighbouring land owners. The court heard arguments from all sides. The final order text is not provided in the excerpt.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use (From Agriculture to Non-Agriculture Purposes in Non-Planning Areas) Rules, 2017: Rule 4
  • Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971: Section 47A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Madras Hears Challenge to Rejection of Land Use Conversion Application Under Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use Rules, 2017. Petitioner Sought Quashing of Panchayat President's Order Dated 25.04.2024 and Direction to Forward Application Unde...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeal by Electricity Supply Company Against Labour Court Order Awarding Retrenchment Compensation Upon Takeover by State Electricity Board. Workmen Claimed Compensation Under U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Alleging Terminati...