Search Results for "SEZ Rules"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits.

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Delhi High Court Order Setting Aside Central Government's Allocation of Raw Pet-Coke. Court Restores Allocation Based on EPCA Recommendations and Production Capacity, Holding That High Court Erred in Interfering with Policy Decisions on Environmental Grounds.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Delhi High Court judgment that set aside the Central Government's allocation of imported raw pet-coke (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeal, Upholds Confiscation of Cosmetics Imported Through Non-Notified Port. Import of Cosmetics Through Marmagoa Port Violates Rule 133 Read with Rule 43-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as Cosmetics Are Not Exempted Under Rule 132 and Schedule D.

The Commissioner of Customs, Goa, filed an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate Satisfaction Orders in Cooperative Bank Dispute. Special Recovery Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on validity of recovery certificates or order refund under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, M/s. Vilas Transport Co., a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two or...