KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Rule 14A"
132 result(s) found
Found 132 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Initiates Suo-Motu Writ Petition Challenging Appointments of Personal Assistants to Judges. Selection Process Through Circular Dated 07.06.2023 Found to Contravene Rule 14A of Madras High Court Service Rules, 2015, and Article 14 Due to Arbitrary Relaxations and Irregularities.
1 Jul 2026Background: The High Court of Madras, through a Division Bench, initiated a suo-motu writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, tak...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court upheld the ITAT's decision to delete the transfer pricing adjustment made by the Revenue, finding that the comparable selection and benchmarking analysis were correctly applied under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
12 Sep 2025The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against a common order dated 08.11.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate T...
- 15
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Insurance Company Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Disallowance of Claims and Deductions. The court held that the assessee's method of accounting for outstanding claims and the deduction under Section 80M were correctly allowed by the Tribunal.
9 Jan 2025The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, again...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Banking Company Due to Lack of New Material. Section 148 Notice Under Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside as Reasons for Reopening Were Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.
1 Aug 2023The petitioner, DCB Bank Ltd., challenged a notice dated 24 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessme...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Section 10B Exemption Case - Expansion of Existing Unit Not Eligible for Deduction. The court held that the Assessee's expansion of its existing processing capacity with new plant and machinery does not qualify for exemption under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as per the Explanation to Section 10B(7).
22 Oct 2020The case involves appeals by the Revenue against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order allowing deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act,...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Bank in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessing Officer Had Already Considered Exemption Claim During Original Assessment.
21 Sep 2020The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 30.03.2001 issued...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Eviction Petition Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Legal Heirs Not Entitled to Protection After Death of Original Tenant. The court held that Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, does not protect legal heirs of a deceased tenant, and the eviction order was restored.
23 Feb 2016The petitioner, Vidarbha Maharogi Seva Mandal, a public trust, filed an application under Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural L...
- 171
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Eviction Petition Under Section 120(c) of Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Tenancy Rights Extinguish on Death of Last Tenant. Successors Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 120(c) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 as They Were Not Personally Cultivating the Land.
23 Feb 2016The petitioner, Vidarbha Maharogi Seva Mandal, a public trust registered in 1961-1962, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.83 and Gat...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 for Lack of Fresh Material — Reassessment Based on Same Facts as Original Assessment is Invalid. The Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen an assessment on the same facts and material already considered during the original assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it amounts to a mere change of opinion.
10 Jun 2010The Petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the reopening of its assessment for Assessment Year 2002-03 under Secti...
- 13
