Search Results for "Representation Disposal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Representation Disposal"

1487 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1487 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Law Dispute Over Financial Upgradation Under ACP and MACP Schemes. The Court upheld the respondent's entitlement to financial benefits, distinguishing the case from precedent involving non-functional upgradation, and noted compliance with the Tribunal's order without ruling on the time-bar objection raised by the appellants.

24 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute over financial upgradation benefits under service schemes. The respondent, a TV News and Film Librarian at Doordarshan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Delay in Considering Representation — Right Under Article 22(5) Violated. Inordinate delay of 31 days in considering detenu's representation by State Government without explanation vitiates preventive detention order under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

30 Nov 2023

The petitioner, wife of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 02.06.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Section 3 of the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Expeditious Consideration Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The Court held that failure to decide the detenu's representation promptly renders the detention order illegal and directed release.

15 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sangharsh Alias Bhavya Nitin Adsul, challenged an order of detention dated 29th September 2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed by Delayed Consideration of Detenue's Representation.

19 Mar 2021

The petitioner, sister of the detenue Illiyas Gulab Shaikh, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order dated 22.06.2020 passed by the Commi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's pending bail application and the order was passed mechanically without proper application of mind.

12 May 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Kenneth Jideofor, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.01.2020 passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 13th November 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Railway...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Representation. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Less Restrictive Measures and Unexplained Delay of 22 Days in Disposal of Representation Violated Article 22(5) of Constitution.

18 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Maimuna, wife of the detenu Sri. Akbar Siddik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Inadequate Verification of In-camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was vitiated as it did not consider the detenu's bail status and the in-camera statements were not properly verified, violating Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 26 April 2016 by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

30 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Witness Statements. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider in-camera statements, violating the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Ravi Hanumant Thorat, brother-in-law of the detenu Sahadeo @ Sada Laxman Dhavare, challenged the validity of a preventive detention or...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)