Search Results for "Repeal Act abatement"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Before Repeal. Application for Exemption Under Section 20 Rejected as Land Had Vested in State; No Abatement Upon Repeal.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing a writ petition challenging the rejection of an exemption application under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Adoption Dispute Due to Abatement — Conflict of Decrees Would Arise if Appeal Proceeded. Right to Sue Did Not Survive to Surviving Appellant Alone; Appeal Abated as a Whole Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a suit challenging the validity of an adoption. The appellants, two brothers, had filed a suit seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...