Search Results for "Reference to Larger Bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Reference to Larger Bench"

23 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Conflict on Emergency Parole for POCSO Convicts to Larger Bench. Interpretation of Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Requires Resolution of Conflicting Decisions on Entitlement of Convicts Under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.

6 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Pintu Uttam Sonale, a convict under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Protection of Children from S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question of Quashing Non-Compoundable Offences Under Section 482 CrPC Based on Settlement, Reconsidering B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, and Manoj Sharma. The Court Doubts Whether Non-Compoundable Offences Can Be Indirectly Compounded via Inherent Powers, Noting Section 320(9) CrPC's Bar.

1 Aug 2026

The matter arose from a Special Leave Petition filed by one Gian Singh, who had been convicted under Sections 420 (cheating) and 120B (criminal conspi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

1 Aug 2019

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Removal of Gram Panchayat Members, Holds Reasonable Cause Must Be Considered Under Section 43-A(1)(iii) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Literal Interpretation Requiring Automatic Disqualification for Four Consecutive Absences Rejected; Opportunity of Hearing Includes Evaluation of Explanations.

22 Jan 2025

The petitioners were elected members of the Kalallughatta Gram Panchayat in Nelamanagala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. Their membership was termina...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets MEPS Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981 on Retired Awardee Teacher as Inquiry Committee Member. Conflict Between Division Bench Judgments on Whether Retired Teacher Can Be a Member Referred to Larger Bench for Authoritative Pronouncement.

10 Mar 2016

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict between two Division Bench judgments on the interpretation of Rule 36(2)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Clarifies Law on Whether a Retired State/National Awardee Teacher Can Serve on Inquiry Committee Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Reference Answered Resolving Conflicting Division Bench Precedents on Composition of Inquiry Committee Under MEPS Rules.

10 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court Full Bench was constituted to resolve a conflict between two Division Bench judgments on whether a retired teacher holding a Sta...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

9 Jun 2014

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

30 Aug 2006

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Suit. Issue Concerning Classification of Decree Under Order 9 Rule 6 or Order 8 Rule 5 CPC Remains Unresolved in Incomplete Judgment.

29 Sep 2006

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenged an order of the Small Causes Court, Bombay, which had set aside an ex-parte decree ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)