Search Results for "Recovery Panchanama"

1656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in MCOCA Special Case No.1 of 2006. Accused-Appellants Were Convicted Under Various IPC and MCOCA Sections for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder; Appeals Heard and Disposed by Common Judgment.

The case involved the abduction, ransom demand, and murder of Sagar Sahani, son of businessman Satinder Sahani. On 14 August 2005, Sagar was abducted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Electricity Theft Under Section 135(a) of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 — Hook on LT Supply Line Constitutes Theft. Assessment of civil liability under Section 154(5) is integral to sentencing and must be determined by the Special Court.

The appellant, Bhagwant Nivrutti Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, in Special Case (Electricity) No.51 of 2006 for the offence pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.307 OF 1994

The case involved three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused (original accused nos.1 to 4, 7 and 8) against the judgment and order dated 28/4/1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.678 OF 2014

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS and Customs Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Customs Department Failed to Prove Conscious Possession of Contraband and Compliance with Mandatory Search and Seizure Requirements Under NDPS Act.

The case involves an appeal by the Assistant Collector of Customs, Bombay, against the acquittal of three respondents (original accused) by the Specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 376(D), 377, 120-B IPC. Appeal Challenges Sessions Court Conviction for Gang Rape and Unnatural Offences at Shakti Mills.

The criminal appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Division Bench) stemmed from the conviction of the appellant-original accused no.1 ...